CTE background
Joe Ward et al, “110 NFL Brains” ; Collecting the brains (TED talk)
Michael Powell, “This Helmet Will save Football. Actually Probably Not”
Ethical background
Which categories of behavior is a government justified in restricting?
Some useful distinctions
- Deliberate, accidental
- Causing, creating risk
- Non-consensual, consensual
- Other-harming, self-harming
- Committing murder
- Going to party while awaiting results after being tested for coronavirus (Dartmouth case)
- Leaving lock down area after quarantine orders (northern Italy)
- Participating in a duel
Wikipedia |
(B) Self-harming behavior
- Participating in a duel
- Riding motorcycle without helmet
- Driving without seatbelts
- Drinking huge sodas
(C) Offensive but not harmful (we won't discuss)
(D) Immoral but not harmful (we won't discuss)
Positions
Libertarianism: liberty of adults may only be limited in (A) cases (other-harming), not in (B) cases (self-harming).
- John Stuart Mill, On Liberty (1859)
Paternalism: liberty may be limited in both (A) cases and (B) cases.
- Sarah Conly, Against Autonomy ( 2013)
Next time
- Sarah Conly chapter
- Her argument for Paternalism
- Two forms of Paternalism: coercive vs. liberal.
- Why she favors coercive
- Does football fall in class (A) or (B)?
- In principle, should football be outlawed?
- What about other dangerous sports? Free solo climbing, boxing, etc.
No comments:
Post a Comment